tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post5908207210136126346..comments2023-11-23T02:12:35.461-08:00Comments on <center>las vegas law blog</center>: The Capital Gazettelaw.dawghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12091995027411414418noreply@blogger.comBlogger42125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-67782602207733217402018-07-02T10:41:37.641-07:002018-07-02T10:41:37.641-07:00Yes. Do better, Judge.Yes. Do better, Judge.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-53436997420458341972018-07-02T10:35:05.066-07:002018-07-02T10:35:05.066-07:008:05 has a point. Tell me at least 4:01, 4:09, 4:...8:05 has a point. Tell me at least 4:01, 4:09, 4:13, and 4:17 aren't the same person. If you want to manufacture conversation on a given viewpoint you should try to make it less obvious. Do better. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-43038982326979286342018-07-01T22:26:14.906-07:002018-07-01T22:26:14.906-07:00Interesting point about the NVSCT use of prejudice...Interesting point about the NVSCT use of prejudice in response to legal issues. They also did this in the Southern Capital order (Mar 2018) which overturned a jury verdict (!) because no evidence of prejudice. If sale is bad as a matter of law, evidence of prejudice is not needed. Alternatively, prejudice would be presumed because how can you possibly know who may have bid. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-35687822382099266242018-07-01T11:01:16.572-07:002018-07-01T11:01:16.572-07:00We are supporting Jerry Tao. He is more experienc...We are supporting Jerry Tao. He is more experienced, and smart.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-30257104392685324532018-06-30T14:00:22.903-07:002018-06-30T14:00:22.903-07:002:14 is part of a troubling trend--attorneys who t...2:14 is part of a troubling trend--attorneys who think a judge is a disaster in a certain court, so in order to get rid of such judge it is suggested we vote them to a higher court.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-32782269190771117042018-06-30T13:55:35.447-07:002018-06-30T13:55:35.447-07:00For all of you who are getting upset with each oth...For all of you who are getting upset with each other based on the comments on this thread, be assured my thoughts and prayers are with you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-21906929695055252502018-06-30T09:17:18.778-07:002018-06-30T09:17:18.778-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03194640727101072869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-56140879325485168812018-06-29T23:33:42.915-07:002018-06-29T23:33:42.915-07:00@ 9:26 I am the individual whose paragraph you dis...@ 9:26 I am the individual whose paragraph you dispute, and I am writing to respond to you. By following your reasoning, I could not refute the existence of the Tooth Fairy. But the existence of the Tooth Fairy is as improbable as the existence of God. I cannot deductively prove that there is no God any more than I cannot deductively prove that there is no Tooth Fairy. One cannot prove a negative. But my inductive reasoning, fundamentally grounded in probabilities and common sense, remains strong. Also, when people send their "prayers," they aren't sending them to "gravity," quantum entanglement, or some metaphysical energy; they're sending them on the premise that there is a "conception of God [that] IS childlike" (caps emphasis added), so your criticism of me strays from the topic of discussion. In other words, you missed the point. Signed "The Tooth Fairy Agnostic" (someone who is an agnostic about Tooth Fairies b/c their existence cannot be disproved)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-34034989137311184512018-06-29T22:25:15.013-07:002018-06-29T22:25:15.013-07:009:26 again, Must be a boring Friday night huh? Me ...9:26 again, Must be a boring Friday night huh? Me too haha, I'm just saying that conclusory statements are fun on a blog but sometimes it's great to really form a strong argument kind of like playing blog chess. Anyway have a great weekend friend, I'm off to the strip for some food.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-65529625900331449592018-06-29T21:33:38.365-07:002018-06-29T21:33:38.365-07:00Santa clause better give me something good. That i...Santa clause better give me something good. That is childlike. It is also make believe like God. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-38833555882009291012018-06-29T21:26:17.946-07:002018-06-29T21:26:17.946-07:00Ignoring all Spiritual arguments, there are two bi...Ignoring all Spiritual arguments, there are two big problems with your arguments: 1) it is not logical, you have not tied size in any way to the possibility of "comprehension" about "insignificant" people and 2) your conception of God is childlike i.e., the big guy in the sky. Think of it this way, gravity affects everything (we think) in the universe and there are no known items that are far away or insignificant enough to be out of its grip. (For chatting purposes I'm ignoring quantum mechanics and the integrated theories.) You have the right to believe as you wish and post as you wish but saying the universe is too big for God to attend to the smallest is a very poor argument structurally, IMO.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-2867200171198754632018-06-29T20:40:38.062-07:002018-06-29T20:40:38.062-07:00Thank you, Cadish.Thank you, Cadish.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-82812995007661932352018-06-29T20:08:34.167-07:002018-06-29T20:08:34.167-07:00Louis schneider weighs in. Smart, get someone tha...Louis schneider weighs in. Smart, get someone that doesn't practice in that area of law.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-44351524254208568542018-06-29T20:05:18.818-07:002018-06-29T20:05:18.818-07:00Here we go again. The same anti-Cadish bullshit po...Here we go again. The same anti-Cadish bullshit poster talking to himself. At least try to space out the comments to make it look believable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-15733891679472668422018-06-29T17:59:42.846-07:002018-06-29T17:59:42.846-07:00Do you do dishes in the sink? Do you like to suds ...Do you do dishes in the sink? Do you like to suds up the sink? How many bubbles are in a sudsy sink? That's what the universe is: bubbles. Millions of them. Millions of bubbles--films of matter surrounding vast voids of nothing. These films of matter are made of superclusters of galaxies, which in turn are made of clusters of galaxies. And our galaxy, which alone has over 100 billion stars and several smaller galaxies orbiting it, isn't even part of a cluster. The point: your average person cannot comprehend how BIG the universe is and how insignificant we are. And THAT explains why THERE IS NO GOD! No "god" could possibly exist that could isolate and attend to our insignificance. And religion is nothing more than an exercise of one's own EGO: "It's all about ME. God cares about ME just like he does a sparrow." Religion is also a great tool to manipulate people, which is just what is being done when "prayers" are substituted for action--political, vengeful, or otherwise . . . .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-4614340078611647522018-06-29T16:17:19.610-07:002018-06-29T16:17:19.610-07:00My investor is E.F.Hutton, and EF Hutton says....My investor is E.F.Hutton, and EF Hutton says....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-68132400099169674522018-06-29T16:13:17.414-07:002018-06-29T16:13:17.414-07:00Wait, what? Seriously? That is scary.Wait, what? Seriously? That is scary.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-8544020088618884252018-06-29T16:09:00.481-07:002018-06-29T16:09:00.481-07:00She goes to her husband for advice. He was a mort...She goes to her husband for advice. He was a mortgage man.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-90165556101820980052018-06-29T16:01:08.955-07:002018-06-29T16:01:08.955-07:00Yes, please vote for E. Cadish for Supreme Court. ...Yes, please vote for E. Cadish for Supreme Court. Woman cannot find a vowel in real estate, clueless.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-24234293066212579222018-06-29T14:55:15.535-07:002018-06-29T14:55:15.535-07:00I get it now, "we can make it up as we go alo...I get it now, "we can make it up as we go along because there are no rules." Just what we need, more soft-minded superpriority nonsense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-2674844616052042832018-06-29T14:14:58.781-07:002018-06-29T14:14:58.781-07:00just read decision and yes Nevada Supreme is out o...just read decision and yes Nevada Supreme is out of control... nothing about due process... most incompetent court in USAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-9224534453256474522018-06-29T14:04:36.813-07:002018-06-29T14:04:36.813-07:00All HOA foreclosure cases are fraud sales and Neva...All HOA foreclosure cases are fraud sales and Nevada Supreme Court is cleaning its own mess SFR decision from 2014Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-14707697587349836012018-06-29T13:28:57.308-07:002018-06-29T13:28:57.308-07:001:14-- I hear your point that presuming that "...1:14-- I hear your point that presuming that "thoughts and prayers" is necessarily hollow is premature and presumtuous. With that said, I understand the sentiment that "thoughts and prayers" has become an almost autoreply without any thought or uniqueness to its application. It has become cliché. Heartfelt thoughts and prayers can and arguably should be the beginning of any response to such tragedies; however it should not and cannot be the end of our sentiments and response.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-77632240917419711682018-06-29T13:14:44.440-07:002018-06-29T13:14:44.440-07:00@ 9:50 - your comments make the leap that "po...@ 9:50 - your comments make the leap that "politicians" aren't making calls or trying to effectuate changes. You presume that all that is being offered is a pointless "thoughts and prayers" comment. Yes, without doubt some people make that comment and it's empty. But, have you ever actually said or written "my thoughts and prayers are with you"? If you have you know how hard it is to say those words - they typically come from the heart and in the face of tragedy. They are an immediate response. Many of us that act don't broadcast our actions - we don't indicate where we donate funds, what meals we deliver to families, what our vote is on policy laws. To condemn everyone for using that phrase is misplaced logic. It's probably true that many politicians are overusing the phrase - but politicians in general should not be the example of the moral high ground. So to use a politician as your example already assumes the comment regarding "thoughts and prayers" comes from a selfish place. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7637960526696603209.post-54405988686235531722018-06-29T12:41:57.815-07:002018-06-29T12:41:57.815-07:00The West Sunset opinion is a veritable mess. I am...The West Sunset opinion is a veritable mess. I am really starting to belief that the NVSCT has no idea what it is doing on these superpriority cases and is just alternating one for the bank, one for the investor, one for the bank, one of the investor.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com