Thursday, February 2, 2017

Highly Unlikely


  • There are allegations of extortion in the Badlands golf course development matter by the developers against Frank Schreck. [RJ]
  • The We The People competition starts this weekend and features an all-star lineup of local judges and officials. [eighthjdcourt blog]
  • Is the stadium deal dead in the water? [TNI]

15 comments:

  1. Good opinion by Supreme Court today.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Please, Lord Sheldon, do not revive that Stadium deal. I don't want to pick up the tab when the room tax falls short!

    If this thing doesn't come back to life, Mark Davis looks like a complete moron. Now he has to go back to Oakland with his tail between his legs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. Please let this idiotic stadium proposal die. No offense to Lords Adelson and Wynn, but the peasants are tired over every escalating demands for dues. I till the land all day and can barely keep a roof over my family. If the market supports a stadium, the market will find a way to make it happen without taking even more from me.

      Delete
    2. Amen. Now get back to work.

      Delete
    3. Adelson, please give me some bread!

      Delete
    4. Let them eat cake

      Delete
  3. Here's the correct link for the Badland's article. http://www.reviewjournal.com/local/las-vegas/opponents-proposed-las-vegas-development-accused-extortion

    ReplyDelete
  4. Another attorney accused of wrong doing, no way! Bar counsel, where were ya? Ah, chasing people down over pennies. Ha!

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1:23, What case/attorney are you talking about?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I assume he is talking about Frank Schreck, although the allegations in that article don't seem to be something the bar would likely look into.

      Delete
    2. Today's headlines, F. Schreck.

      Delete
    3. Are you serious 1:23? The flimsiest pile of crap. If you believe everything in the article, Schreck stated that the land should remain open space. That is the Queensridge parties' entire argument-- it is required to remain open space. None of the foregoing (even if it was true) constitutes extortion under NRS 205.320. This is the most bogus piece of crap argument and yet the R/J is willing to publish it because it gets attention.

      Delete
    4. it says "accused" take it up with the RJ

      Delete
    5. I need me some F. Schreck bread.

      Delete
  6. There as some people on this blog who need to have a Trump melt down. Some of you are some uptight fucks.

    ReplyDelete