Monday, January 25, 2016

Retroactive Review


  • A look at asset forfeiture and where those monies go. [RJ]
  • Here is Jane Ann Morrison's assessment of judicial races. [RJ]
  • An editorial on why you shouldn't vote for Catherine Ramsey. [RJ]
  • The US Supreme Court held that the ban on automatic life sentences for juveniles is retroactive. [NPR]
  • Former AG and current senatorial candidate Catherine Cortez-Masto's husband runs security for two medical marijuana businesses. [Free Beacon]

5 comments:

  1. As I recall, the Las Vegas Review Journal gave a wholehearted endorsement to Elizabeth Halverson a few years back. This article make me think I should throw my support and a few bucks to Ramsey. WTF does the RK know about what goes on in District Court anyway?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To paraphrase John Nance Garner, the RJ's opinion on who to vote for in a judicial (or any other) election isn't worth a bucket of warm spit.

      Delete
    2. Agreed. Maybe not even that. And what a piece of snark at that.

      Delete
  2. who wrote the editorial piece, dave thomas?

    ReplyDelete